Republican Senator Lays the Groundwork for Possible Filibuster of Obama's Supreme Court Nominee
On Sunday, the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Jeff Sessions, suggested that the country had moved to a place "in which there is not as much deference" -- "this automatic powerful deference" -- given to the President's Supreme Court nominees as in the past. Earlier, he refused to "rule out" using a filibuster.
"I have not favored a filibuster," said the Alabama Republican during an appearance on C-SPAN Newsmakers. "I opposed two nominees in the Clinton years aggressively. Trent Lott said it was time to bring it up for a vote. I voted for cloture to give them a final vote because I did not favor a filibuster technique... But you remember the gang of fourteen? The Democrats were filibustering Bush nominees and they said 'well, in extraordinary circumstances but only in those circumstances should you justify a filibuster.' Maybe that's the new standard. It's not in concrete but that may be the standard that is used in the future."
As you recall, Jeff Sessions is a bit of a racist. Naturally he can not come right out and admit to this, so he is shopping around for another rationale to oppose Obama's nominee.
His pointing to the "gang of fourteen" is interesting, because he is wrong (what a shock). One, the Democrats were not filibustering Bush's Supreme Court nominees. They should have, but they did not. Secondly, Sessions is clearly trying to use the old "they did it first" bit to give the Republicans cover.
The fact is a Supreme Court nominee has never been filibustered. There have been nominees who were not confirmed, but never filibustered. If Jeff Sessions wants to play this game the Democrats have more than enough ammo for the fight. Anything Sessions says is instantly counterable by his past racist comments. Also, the Democrats have a very strong argument that by electing Obama the American people were fully aware he might have to fill a vacancy on the bench. Well, now there is a vacancy and he is going to fill it. If people did not trust him to make this choice he would not have been elected.


Matt, I'm not getting why you bring up Sessions racist past. Obama has not named a nominee, brown, black or white. No doubt the right fears Obama naming justices to the Supreme Court and lower constitutional courts but I really doubt that race or gender will be what motivates the right. To be clear, the right will oppose any nominee they see as liberal regardless of race or gender.
But here is what I fear, Obama continuing his center policies and appointing center to center right judges.
Reply to this
Hello again KidA,
Your point is well taken about how the Republicans will scream no matter who Obama picks. I bring up Sessions past b/c there is a lot of chatter that it will be a minority. And then Sessions' comments could easily be dismissed. And truth be told, it is fun to bash Sessions...
Reply to this
"And truth be told, it is fun to bash Sessions..."
Well, you have me there.
Reply to this
This was an important commentary. I stumbled by your piece of writing and found it extraordinarily valuable.
Reply to this
I mean, helpful article. I found it on google. Cool Scooby Doo Games and Cartoon games online for kids plus new Avatar Games online downloads, and new Pirate Games, Days 2 Die 2.
Reply to this
I mean, nice info. I visit here evaryday. New Hidden object and Mahjong for girls, good Download Free Games downloads, and new WW Games, Super Alpha Soup.
Reply to this
Nothing is more revealing than movement.
Reply to this